Attack Of The Show

Hey guys its me braylon and if you don’t know by now check this out:  

G4’s two longest-running and defining series, Attack of the Show! and X-Play, will be ending their run at the end of 2012. Both shows will include original episodes through the end of the year, and will look back at their most memorable mom…

ents as we lead up to their final episodes. A rotating lineup of guest co-hosts including John Barrowman, Michael Ian Black, Josh Myers, Paul Scheer, Rob Huebel and Horatio Sanz will join AOTS hosts Candace Bailey andSara Underwood, and X-Play hosts Morgan Webb and Blair Herter as part of the farewell shows.With well over a thousand episodes each, Attack of the Show! and X-Play have defined gamer culture for a generation, serving as the launch pad for prominent personalities including Kevin Pereira, Olivia Munn, Chris Hardwick and Adam Sessler. Attack of the Show! debuted March 28, 2005 and from the start was the ultimate guide to everything cool and new in the world of technology, web culture, gaming and pop culture. X-Play made its debut almost two years earlier, on April 28, 2003 (on G4’s previous incarnation: TechTV), and immediately became the go-to destination for young men seeking the latest video game news, honest reviews, hands-on demos and exclusive video game trailers and footage. The year-end celebration will take you back through highlights of these landmark shows’ history, including its exclusive live-from-the-floor coverage of San Diego Comic-Con and E3.

Both long-running shows helped define, as well as expand, the pop culture and gaming TV experience for a generation. We hope you’ve had as much fun watching them as we have had making them, and sincerely hope you join us in bidding a fond farewell to Attack of the Show and X-Play’s as we look back over the next two months and head towards each series’ finale.

Now I think that tihs is messed up because what is G4 going to do now especially when E3 and CES comes around. Just sad here are some comments:
George Ray Mitchell This is because all the good hosts are gone. No one cares now.
Kyle K Cool Bey This is terrible news! These are your flagship programs!
Ian Rash I remember there was once a time I liked both of those shows but, they really screwed it up when they tried to make XPlay an attack of the show for video games. I miss the funny reviews, thats what made xplay great. AOTS, I’m honestly not surprised, the show has been going down hill for the past 3 years. It’s a shame but, out with the old, in with the new.
Trevor Buffi theyre pretty much getting rid of the definition of G4TV by taking these shows off the air. they’re 2 of the only very few reasons people watch G4 to begin with
So what do you think? Let me know.
Know what you do and do what you know.
Braylon Lee


Hey guys I need to let you guys know something: I am a christian and I ain’t scared to tell you. Now since we have that understood, check this out:

Charlie Fuqua, the Republican candidate for the Arkansas House of Representatives who called for expelling Muslims from the United States in his book, also wrote in support for instituting the death penalty for “rebellious children.”

In “God’s Law,” Fuqua’s 2012 book, the candidate wrote that while parents love their children, a process could be set up to allow for the institution of the death penalty for “rebellious children,” according to the Arkansas Times. Fuqua, who is anti-abortion, points out that the course of action involved in sentencing a child to death is described in the Bible and would involve judicial approval. While it is unlikely that many parents would seek to have their children killed by the government, Fuqua wrote, such power would serve as a way to stop rebellious children.

According to the Arkansas Times, Fuqua wrote:

The maintenance of civil order in society rests on the foundation of family discipline. Therefore, a child who disrespects his parents must be permanently removed from society in a way that gives an example to all other children of the importance of respect for parents. The death penalty for rebellious children is not something to be taken lightly. The guidelines for administering the death penalty to rebellious children are given in Deut 21:18-21:

This passage does not give parents blanket authority to kill their children. They must follow the proper procedure in order to have the death penalty executed against their children. I cannot think of one instance in the Scripture where parents had their child put to death. Why is this so? Other than the love Christ has for us, there is no greater love then [sic] that of a parent for their child. The last people who would want to see a child put to death would be the parents of the child. Even so, the Scrpture provides a safe guard to protect children from parents who would wrongly exercise the death penalty against them. Parents are required to bring their children to the gate of the city. The gate of the city was the place where the elders of the city met and made judicial pronouncements. In other words, the parents were required to take their children to a court of law and lay out their case before the proper judicial authority, and let the judicial authority determine if the child should be put to death. I know of many cases of rebellious children, however, I cannot think of one case where I believe that a parent had given up on their child to the point that they would have taken their child to a court of law and asked the court to rule that the child be put to death. Even though this procedure would rarely be used, if it were the law of land, it would give parents authority. Children would know that their parents had authority and it would be a tremendous incentive for children to give proper respect to their parents.

In the same book, Fuqua advocated for expelling Muslims from the U.S., saying it would solve what he described as the “Muslim problem.” Fuqua, who has been backed by the state GOP and is seeking a comeback, has found himself under attack by Republicans since his comments surfaced at the same time it was reported that state Rep. Jon Hubbard (R-Jonesboro) endorsed slavery in his book. Fuqua told the Associated Press that he was surprised by the reaction to his writings on Muslims.

“I think my views are fairly well-accepted by most people,” Fuqua said to AP.

Fuqua declined to answer questions from The Huffington Post.

“I’m not going to talk to you,” he said before hanging up.

On his campaign blog, Fuqua highlights his service on the Children and Families Committee while a member of the Arkansas Legislature in 1997. He also describes liberals and Muslims as the “anti-Christ” and says he believes they are conspiring to create a “bloody revolution.”

“There is a strange alliance between the liberal left and the Muslim religion. It may be that since both are the enemies of Christianity, that they both believe that, my enemy’s enemy is my friend,” Fuqua writes. “However there are several similarities between the two. Both are antichrist in that they both deny that Jesus is God in the flesh of man, and the savior of mankind. They both also hold that their cause should take over the entire world through violent, bloody, revolution.”

Now I don’t get rildup up much but this does because first off Wow! and seconed death for rebellious children their is a way to discipline children but it all starts at home be the example you would want your childern to be if they are  rebellious look who they go it from just saying.  Now this is on KATV channel 7’s facebook page and it is getting a lot of comments here are some of them:

Michelle Liles- He’s an idiot! Let’s execute him! I’m sure he wasn’t a perfect angel, I mean he did become a politician

Chris Hicks- Kelly, if you look at David’s posts in this thread alone, you’d see he keeps mentioning race when it has nothing to do with the topic. My observation was valid. Maybe you could follow your own advice and bring something useful to the table.
Lena Mancini-  This is madness! Does Mr. Fuqua have any children of his own? He needs prayer!
Braylon Lee -You forgot some of that scripture: but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord. And if that was true you, kelly and a lot of people would be dead right now because we have all have sinned and come short of the glory of GOD. But read the whole scripture: For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.
So when we accept JESUS CHRIST into our lives we are cleansed from all of our sins because JESUS went to die on the cross for our sins.
Braylon Lee – and Deuteronomy 21:18-21 that verse was in the old Testament and GOD Alpha, Omega And I am talking about The GOD not what you believe in David and Kelly does not believe in killing because one of the ten commandments is Thou shalt not kill.. If you actually did your research GOd sent his son JESUS to die for us so we would not have to die for our sins.  
Charles Nichols-  God never implied the execution of children!!! Actually, we are instructed to PROTECT the children however…, I don’t believe a few smacks on the ass when they’re really out of line will get a parent thrown into hell.
Sharon ShaBabii Moore-  @Braylon Lee…I couldnt of said it better myself!!! And so what if the Huffington Post is a “liberal mouth piece” for the Democratic party…everyone is not a republican & besides everyone has their own opinion BUT I HAVE 3 DAUGHTERS & I WISH ANYBODY WOULD TRY TO EVEN HURT THEM…IT WOULD GET UGLY SO I’M NOT GONE EVEN PAINT THAT PIC FOR U!! JUST NONSENSE ANY WAY U LOOK AT IT…CHILDREN ARE BLESSINGS FROM GOD…SMH @ SOME PEOPLE {OUT OF CONTEXT OR NOT}
Renee Haynes-  I have 2 wonderful kids that at times say something disrespectful. At this time I discipline them but would never say here I’m done with them do whatever you want to with them!
Felisha Marie Brewer-  if parents would strictly teach respect they will receive it in return! Im a mother of 3 and my kids respect me and their elders! you need GOD! IM PRAYING FOR YOU AND ANY OTHERS WHO BELIEVE THIS WAY! GOD WILL PERSAVERE.!
Heather Pratt Runyan- Let’s see, why do most kids that end up in the correctional system end up there? Because the adults in thier lives failed them!! You can’t put society’s problems on the backs of children. I don’t care how out of context that comment was taken, it was wrong! You want your children to respect you, then you start teaching and guiding them from the time they are infants.
Brian Dub HiLl – He should die for disrespecting kids like this. No kids life is worth them disobeying there parents. I bet when he was a kid he did stuff that was disrespectful. Oh wait he still is doing stuff that is disrespectful just saying……….
Kari Hulsey Ford – Seriously wtf??? Execute children?? An adult has to set on death row 10+ years before execution for murder rape etc….. but he wants to execute children for being disobedient!!! There wouldn’t be any children left!!!
Brandi Erwin-  He should definitely be “removed” from society.
Deanna Owen Shumate-  Did Mr Fuqua never misbehave as a child?
Jennifer Ann Morgan-  And the man has lost his mind. Many tines the reason a child is disobedient towards their parents is because the parent doesn’t try to control them, or doesn’t give them any attention so the child lashes out to get attention.
Angela Rhodes-  Omg! We don’t need a person with this mentality in our governmental system.
Lulu Garrett – What an idiot, does he even have children and If so I’m sure they were disobedient at some time. So he will have to kill his own.
Jennifer Orr-  Nobody would ever make it to adulthood because everyone disrespects their parents at least once in their life.
Marilyn Hill-  This is crazy!!! Those kids should be spanked and put in place. There is a fine line between fear and respect. If they are to fear punishment given by laws they must first fear the rath of there parents. Spare the rod spoil the child! What does spoil mean people? When meat is spoiled it is no longer of any use!!!!!!! Whip that butt!!!!
By the way did I mention that Charlie Fuqua is running for state office and is challenging for a seat in the Batesville area. WOW!!! Right this man should not be running nor be on the ballot and if that was not enough check this out: Jonesboro area Republican Representative Jon Hubbard’s book drew criticism.  Hubbard argued slavery was a blessing in disguise in his book, “Letters to the Editor: Confessions of a Conservative,” he wrote, “The institution of slavery that the black race has long believed to be an abomination upon its people may actually have been a blessing in disguise.  The blacks who could endure those conditions…would someday be rewarded with citizenship in the greatest nation ever established on the face of the earth.” He is also running for state office Jon Hubbard.
Fuqua’s opponent, Batesville area Democratic Representative James McLean and Hubbard’s challenger Harold Copenhaver say voters should judge the comments themselves, “It’s beyond shocking, it’s beyond outrageous.”  Rep McLean says, “I think it should disqualify anyone from running for or serving in any type of public office.”

The Republican Party of Arkansas condemned the comments made by Hubbard and Fuqua and a spokeswoman says they will not contribute more money to either man’s campaign, but she declined to comment on camera or say whether the party still endorses the candidates.

Chris Hicks- David, that’s the silliest thing I’ve heard all morning. Can you back that up with any facts? And I mean real facts. Not Fox news “some people say” facts.
So what do you think? leave me a comment I want to know what you have to say. Here is the link to the story:
Know what you do and do what you know.
Braylon Lee

The 7

The seven cannons of journalism are very interesting because of how it got started. Their was so much sensationalism that the society of newspaper editors created the seven cannons in response to sensationalism which is the use of shocking material: the practice of emphasizing the most lurid, shocking, and emotive aspects of something under discussion or investigation, especially by the media. So you could call these the standards of journalism. These are the standards that are required for good journalism.

The first cannon is responsibility. Now responsibilty has different meanings for different people for example for teens your responsibilty may be to clean up your room while for adults their responsibilty is to take care of the household. Now in the world of journalism responsibilty means that journalists must always consider the public’s welfare. Which means the state of the public how do they feel, what they are thinking, how will this story impact their life and more. And their are three types of responsibilty and their are social, legal and professional. Now social responsibilty is the responsibilty to reflect what events are happening and to carry out this responsibility in a way that shows viewers that they are in the know about what is going on in the world today. Legal is the next  responsibilty and this  responsibilty is to make sure that they are presenting to you the information the right way go through all the legal requirements to bring you the story. And finally the last responsibilty is professional now this responsibilty is to have sincerity and commitment towards its profession basiclly to care about the work the stories that the journalist puts out. They should be albe to present a storyconfidently and satisfactorily.. The presentation must be truthful and unbiased above all and shall never bring any embarrassment or complicacy to the organization anyway in future.

The second cannon is freedom of the press. Now this cannon is important because it protects our right to say what we mean to say and say it like we mean it.  Now this is the guarantee by a government of free public press for its citizens and their associations, extended to members of news gathering organizations, and their published reporting. It also extends to news gathering and processes involved in obtaining information for public distribution. Not all countries are protected by a bill of rights or the constitutional provision pertaining to Freedom of the Press. Now with freedom of the press we can’t say everything like we mean it. With respect to governmental information, a government distinguishes which materials are public and which are protected from disclosure to the public based on classification of information as sensitive, classified, or secret and being otherwise protected from disclosure due to relevance of the information to protecting the national interest.

And unlike other countries we can cover just about anything we want to cover which is a huge blessing to me especally Government we can actually report on what our government is doing unlike other countries where if you report something on the government you will get consequences and most of the time deadly consequences to be exact. A fun fact for you the founders of the constitution classified government as the fouth estate basiclly the “watchdog” of governmet meaning the public’s eyes and ears to government. The third cannon is independence and what this means is that is the power to write any story you want, with whichever view you wish to put on it, and to have it published with no questions asked. Wow how amazing is that we have the power not to have Government tell us what story or stories  we have to publish. Now in other countries Goverment controlls the media so you have to do what they say. Here is a principle about independence: “Be vigilant and courageous about holding those with power accountable.” To me, this instructs journalists to never be afraid to do the right thing.

The fouth cannon is sincerity, truthfulness and accuracy. To get a better picture I will talk about each one of them, lets start with sincerity. Sincerity means honesty and genuineness: honesty in the expression of true or deep feelings and a synonym of this word is authenticity. In the world of journalism this means that This means that journalist should be thoughtful to other’s feelings. This means that they should not write slandering remarks towards others, think about what you say before you say it. Another one is truthfulness. Truthfulness means Consistently telling the truth; honest and Corresponding to reality; true. What this means in journalsim is that they try to get the meaning out of every story sometimes it is asking questions that others don’t want to ask and sometimes it means going somewhere that they really don’t want to go to but he reasonwhy they do this is so they can get the most out of the story as they possibily can. Accuracy is the foundation upon which everything else is built–context, interpretation, comment, criticism, analysis and debate. And finally accuracy, the word accuracy means the condition or quality of being true, correct, or exact; freedom from error or defect; precision or exactness; correctness. This simply means that every story you do must be accurate so your viewers can have the most information. It must be well-sourced, supported by strong evidence, examined and tested, clear and unambiguous. Verified facts must form the basis of all news, not rumour and speculation.

The fifth cannon is importially. News reports or stories should be free from opinion or bias of any kind. This means just because you report on the story does not mean you get the last say so or the last word or your two cents if you will. And the reason why this is important is because the news is not about what you say, what you view, take, opinion on a certain story is, no you are absolutely, not, not, not ,not, not, not, not to say what you mean to say because in the end the news is about letting people make their own views, points, takes, opinions and descide what is important and what is not important to them. The sixith cannon is fair play an established standard of decency, honesty, etc. Now fair play is used in sports a lot. Football, baseball, soccer, track, basketball, dodgeball, hockey, wrestling, swiming, tennis, volleyball, cricket, racing, and so many more. I wish I could go on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, to infinity and beyond about in the world of journalism this means This canon describes that a journalist should not report any kind of slander or negativity of any kind towards someone, or a business without giving them a fair chance to tell their side. Do not judge a book by its cover if you have not opened the story up to take a good look at it.

And the last cannon is decency. Decency means conformity with moral standards: behavior or an attitude that conforms to the commonly accepted standards of what is right and respectable. And in the world of journalism this means how you treat others. The goldern rule treat others the way you want to be treated it maybe just one phrase but it is important as it is one of the of the laws used in the journalism world. Decency is the “quality of conforming to standards of propriety and morality”. Decency is not just a journalism canon, but a character trait that every human in this world should follow. Everyone in the world should be decent in dealing with others. Whether it is in written form or just casual conversation, everyone deserves decent treatment. An example of decency is in editorials about the president. People can have their own opinions, no matter how strong, but they should not write just to bash and slander the president.

Taste, decency and acceptability

Audiences have different reactions to depictions of violence, nudity, coarse language, or to people in any other situation that is unacceptable to or stigmatized by the local culture or laws (such as the consumption of alcohol, homosexuality, illegal drug use, scatological images, etc.). Even with similar audiences, different organizations and even individual reporters have different standards and practices. These decisions often revolve around what facts are necessary for the audience to know.

When certain distasteful or shocking material is considered important to the story, there are a variety of common methods for mitigating negative audience reaction. Advance warning of explicit or disturbing material may allow listeners or readers to avoid content they would rather not be exposed to. Offensive words may be partially obscured or bleeped. Potentially offensive images may be blurred or narrowly cropped. Descriptions may be substituted for pictures; graphic detail might be omitted. Disturbing content might be moved from a cover to an inside page, or from daytime to late evening, when children are less likely to be watching.

There is often considerable controversy over these techniques, especially concern that obscuring or not reporting certain facts or details is self-censorship that compromises objectivity and fidelity to the truth, and which does not serve the public interest.

All these cannons do have a purpose and that is: Its first loyalty is to citizens

While news organizations answer to many constituencies, including advertisers and shareholders, the journalists in those organizations must maintain allegiance to citizens and the larger public interest above any other if they are to provide the news without fear or favor. This commitment to citizens first is the basis of a news organization’s credibility, the implied covenant that tells the audience the coverage is not slanted for friends or advertisers. Commitment to citizens also means journalism should present a representative picture of all constituent groups in society. Ignoring certain citizens has the effect of disenfranchising them. The theory underlying the modern news industry has been the belief that credibility builds a broad and loyal audience, and that economic success follows in turn. In that regard, the business people in a news organization also must nurture–not exploit–their allegiance to the audience ahead of other considerations.

So the seven cannons are very important in journalism because they are the foundation of journalism. But I always have to remember that Journalism’s first obligation is to the truth.

Democracy depends on citizens having reliable, accurate facts put in a meaningful context. Journalism does not pursue truth in an absolute or philosophical sense, but it can–and must–pursue it in a practical sense. This “journalistic truth” is a process that begins with the professional discipline of assembling and verifying facts. Then journalists try to convey a fair and reliable account of their meaning, valid for now, subject to further investigation. Journalists should be as transparent as possible about sources and methods so audiences can make their own assessment of the information. Even in a world of expanding voices, accuracy is the foundation upon which everything else is built–context, interpretation, comment, criticism, analysis and debate. The truth, over time, emerges from this forum. As citizens encounter an ever greater flow of data, they have more need–not less–for identifiable sources dedicated to verifying that information and putting it in context.

And now I leave you with this:

Harm limitation principle

During the normal course of an assignment a reporter might go about—gathering facts and details, conducting interviews, doing research, background checks, taking photos, video taping, recording sound—harm limitation deals with the questions of whether everything learned should be reported and, if so, how. This principle of limitation means that some weight needs to be given to the negative consequences of full disclosure, creating a practical and ethical dilemma. The Society of Professional Journalists’ code of ethics offers the following advice, which is representative of the practical ideals of most professional journalists. Quoting directly:

  • Show compassion for those who may be affected adversely by news coverage. Use special sensitivity when dealing with children and inexperienced sources or subjects.
  • Be sensitive when seeking or using interviews or photographs of those affected by tragedy or grief.
  • Recognize that gathering and reporting information may cause harm or discomfort. Pursuit of the news is not a license for arrogance.
  • Recognize that private people have a greater right to control information about themselves than do public officials and others who seek power, influence or attention. Only an overriding public need can justify intrusion into anyone’s privacy.
  • Show good taste. Avoid pandering to lurid curiosity.
  • Be cautious about identifying juvenile suspects or victims of sex crimes.
  • Be judicious about naming criminal suspects before the formal filing of charges.
  • Balance a criminal suspect’s fair trial rights with the public’s right to be informed.

Know what you do and do what you know.

Braylon Lee


Did the first show from the new TechTV studios. And it is called Tech Evening News Live @ 4:00. And each student has a different role my role was eddie which is a system that plays packages- the story if you will. And it was hard at first but then I go the hang of it it was really cool to be apart of the show and I have much respect for the peole who work behind the scences to bring us the news. And speaking of the news Channel One News I want to talk aboutwhat could make channel one better: Like for one expand it from a 12 minute program to a 30 minute program which means more time for stories and features, also they need a studio to call their own What would be a good studio for channel one news The Tech TV Model. Plus have a 5 person team: two main anchors, sports anchor, weather anchor and feature anchor. 10 reporters and go into a partnership with ABC News instead.

Know what you do and do what you know.

Braylon Lee

By the way

Check This Out:

Warning: This article contains spoilers for the OUAT Season 2 premiere. Turn back now if you don’t want to be spoiled!

The Once Upon a Time Season 2 premiere (Season 2, Episode 1: “Broken”) answers a question that we’ve all been wondering: What happened to Fairytale Land after the curse?

We’d initially assumed that it was left as-is, except with all of the people missing. But as we learn from newbie Mulan (Jamie Chung), that’s not quite the case. Here’s what we can deduce from what she says.

Fairytale Land is not gone. Regina (Lana Parrilla) tells the Charmings that Fairytale Land is totally gone — disappeared, a void. And while it’s hard to know when she’s lying, it seems like she might really believe this. But she’s wrong.

A land filled with horrors. According to Mulan, the Fairytale Land remains, but it is almost all empty of people, and “the land is ravaged with dangers more fearsome than you can imagine.”

A corner preserved. However, Mulan explains that one “corner of the land was untouched. No one knows why.” The people in this corner were frozen for 28 years; only recently were they released again (presumably around the time Emma [Jennifer Morrison] came to Storybrooke). The survivors have found a safe haven where Mulan and Sleeping Beauty (Sarah Bolger) are headed next.

So, why was one corner kept safe? We’re wondering if this was actually Maleficent’s doing. After all, she knew Regina’s intentions, and even she thought the curse was beyond the pale. Perhaps she was attempting to protect one small part of the world. Or maybe we’re totally off base!
So if you want to be in the know about the hottest show on tv then add this website to your favorites: and

Know what you do and do what you know.

Braylon Lee

PS: Follow me on twitter @BrayBray27 and on facebook just type in Braylon Lee and when you see me, it will be one of my senior pics. So hit me up on facebook and also this blog.

OUAT- Once A Upon A Time

Ok let me just say that season two of once a upon a time will be a good season. In the beginnng there was a new york kind of guy and we were wondering like what is his role in storybrooke? here is some info from wetpaint to help us out: Baelfire: He could be Rumplestiltskin‘s (Robert Carlyle) son, Baelfire. After all, Bae was sent to a “world without magic” — presumably our world. It’s not unreasonable that he may have learned about the curse somehow, and perhaps has been keeping track of the goings on in Storybrooke.

Peter Pan: We know that Captain Hook will play a notable part this season, which leads plenty of fans wonder whether we’ll see Peter Pan, too. This mystery man could be Peter. Maybe he got stuck in our world — perhaps as a side effect of the curse. We assume that Neverland is a different world than Fairytale Land, but maybe Peter was in our world when the curse hit (after all, in Peter Pan he can fly to our world), and as a side effect the curse prevented him from getting back.

The writer of Henry’s book: We still don’t actually know for sure who wrote the Once Upon a Time book that prompted Henry (Jared Gilmore) to find Emma in the first place. We know the origin of the book will be explored this season. Perhaps this character is involved.

Henry’s dad: Assuming Henry mysterious father is independent of one of the people we’ve already mentioned, maybe that’s who this is. After all, we would be far from surprised if it turns out he knows way more about Storybrooke than Emma (Jennifer Morrison) thinks.

So to me I think he is baelfire because that was and still is a mystery from season one: What happened to Rumplestiltskin‘s son? while peter pan, the writer of henry’s book and henry’s dad are for season 2. I think they are going to answer a question from season one before digging into season two.

Also we find out that Mr. Gold/Rumplestilskin double-crossed Emma, took the potion from Emma and more. We also find out that Mr. Gold/Rumplestilskin did bring magic to storybooke for a reason but is not telling, but to me I think it will be told as the season goes on. Mr. Gold releases ” THE SOULSUCKER” the main purpose of the soulsucker to suck souls and won’t stop until he does the job, in this case it it Regina AKA THE EVIL QUEEN.

Regina says ” there is nothing to go back to” referring to fairytail land but there is check this out: There are survivors in Fairytale Land. We think that this is what Parrilla refers to when she says that a new realm will be introduced. While we once believed that Fairytale Land was no more after the Evil Queen’s curse, that isn’t exactly true. The first survivors we’ll meet are Disney princesses, Mulan (Jamie Chung) and Aurora AKA Sleeping Beauty (Sarah Bolger), and a dashing new prince played by Pretty Little Liars actor Julian Morris. So just to let you know this will be exploried a lot during season two.

So now the soulsucker starts to suck Regina but snow white fends it off with a lighter. And then they try again at city hall the charmings try: snow white, prince charming and emma swan.

Battle in the jail as David uses a lit broom to ward off the wraith.

The hat spins and opens a portal. The wraith falls into it and nooo! So does Emma!

Snow jumps in after her, and David tries to follow, but finds himself on the floor.

David and Regina have some words. She pushes him into the wall and the wallpaper tries to choke him. She’s about to kill him when Henry runs in. He says he won’t see her until she gets Emma and Mary Margaret back.

Mulan explains to Beauty about the curse, how they were frozen. The land has fearsome creatures in it, she says. In a “Planet of the Apes”-like ending, Mulan shows Beauty the fearsome creatures: Emma and Snow. “That’s what brought the wraith here,” she says. So Emma and Snow are in fairytale land. So I can’t wait until next sunday. If you missed the  premiere you can see it on the next day.

Know what you do and do what you know.

Braylon Lee

PS: Some info just for you guys:

After watching the Season 2 premiere of “Once Upon A Time” (Sundays at 8 p.m. ET on ABC), HuffPost TV had the pleasure of talking with the show’s creators, Adam Horowitz and Eddy Kitsis.

They discussed some of the events of the premiere and touched on what’s to come this season in our wide-ranging Q&A, which has been edited, condensed and presented below. Read on for some hints on what you can expect from Emma and Snow’s relationship, how we’ll meet Henry’s father, August’s return and what will happen to Regina in upcoming episodes. Spoilers for the Season 2 premiere ahead.

On how Emma and Snow’s relationship will evolve from here:
Kitsis: Well, I think the interesting thing for us on that is that all last season, Emma didn’t believe that [Mary Margaret] was her mom. She was kind of like the big sister, giving her dating advice and things you would never do with your mom. Now they’re in a strange land where Mary Margaret remembers she was Snow White. Snow White doesn’t need a big sister, and Snow White has more information about that land than Emma. So I think it’ll be interesting as they feel out their mother/daughter/big sister/friend/best friend relationship. And I think that what’s also interesting is that it’s one thing to believe [that magic is real and Snow is her mom] and it’s another thing to see it. Now Emma’s actually in the land where Henry kept telling her she was really from. And so I think there’s a real mix of emotions. And we’re excited also that you’re going to get a bit of Emma before she had Henry. [The flashback to Emma’s past] will be Episode 6 … In that episode you’ll meet Henry’s father.

On Charming’s story while Snow and Emma are trapped:
Kitsis: He’s Dustin Hoffman in “Kramer vs. Kramer,” except instead of his wife leaving him, she fell through a magical hat into another world. [Laughs.] What’s so interesting for David is he now has a wife to find, a daughter to find, a town to run, and a grandson to take care of, even though he was a parent for 28 minutes. And so there’s a lot to unwind in the town. There’s lots of questions I’m sure people have, like, “Can they leave, and what the hell was that smoke, and what the hell’s going to happen?” He’s going to have to sort through that all and bring his wife back. Luckily for him, Snow and Emma are not damsels in distress, so I have a feeling they’ll be able to find their own way back.
Horowitz: We call them “damsels with daggers.”

On writing strong female characters:
Kitsis: For us, that was the kind of show we wanted to do, because we weren’t interested in weakness with women, because that’s not real. And what’s real is a Snow White that wields a sword, and that can steal, and torture a knight with a pickaxe.
Horowitz: Exactly. From day one of writing the pilot, I remember writing the first sequence. We sat there and we said, “When that queen comes in, who’s going to pull the sword?” “It has to be Snow.” And that kind of started it.

On Regina’s journey this season:
Horowitz: She’s got a dilemma.
Kitsis: Well, for us, what was interesting about writing the finale was, she had a choice. We have seen an entire season of her making the wrong choices. This one is, you can save Henry or you could save your curse, but you can’t have both. And she chose her son, so it makes you wonder if that void in her heart has been filled. And I think in the premiere, one of our favorite moments is Regina finding out that the only reason Emma and Snow are helping her is because Henry asked.
Horowitz: That’s the thing; she can be evil and she can do terrible, terrible things. But if we understand why, and there’s a humanity at the core of that, that’s what allows you to watch it. It allows us to write it. You still want her to be a villain. You still want her to be an antagonist. But she’s got extremely good arguments for everything. She raised that kid for 10 years before this woman came. But she has to balance the fact that she tried to be a mom with the fact that she does horrible things like curse millions of people.
Kitsis: And yes, she took her son to a psychiatrist who turned out to be a cricket because her son had delusions that these books were real, only to find out they were actually true. So there’s some damage control to be done with her [and Henry].

On Rumple and Belle:
Kitsis: The thing that’s great about Belle is, she can see the beauty beneath the skin, and Rumple clearly has a plan. I don’t think in that plan, as meticulous as he is, he ever accounted for her being alive. So again, there’s a man who’s often faced choices between love and power …
Horowitz: That’s the thing; it’s about having these choices, having these crossroads, and creating these dilemmas where, as a writer and an audience member, you can look and say, “I’d want to go left, too. I know I should go this way.” But the deck is stacked so that you get why they make the choice, even if it’s wrong.

On August’s return:
Horowitz: You will see him.
Kitsis: Yeah. We can’t tell you how, or why, or where, or when, but we can tell you that Eion Bailey will be back this season.
Horowitz: Yeah, we’re very excited to have him returning and to further that character’s story.

On bringing back The Huntsman (Jamie Dornan) at some point — and whether they regret killing him:
Kitsis: Well, we designed that character to die, but knowing Jamie and how much we love him, of course it tortures us.
Horowitz: We love Jamie so much.
Kitsis: We’d love to get him back again this year. He just did a movie, so he’s busy.
Horowitz:He’s part of the DNA of the show, and because of that he’s always a part of it. Any time we can find the way to bring him in, we would be happy to do it.
Kitsis: Yeah, in the finale that was sort of our fave — we designed that entire thing just to give him that entrance where he pulls the mask up. His handsomeness will stun you.

On Captain Hook’s (Colin O’Donoghue) introduction:
Horowitz: All we can reveal is that he will tie in rather quickly, in this first batch of episodes …
Kitsis: He has interesting relationships with a few of our characters …

On bringing in other iconic characters — such as Ariel — who were rumored early on, but aren’t in the first batch of episodes:
Kitsis: There’s a lot of characters and people that we have ideas for, it’s just a matter of when we get to them. We’re going to meet Lancelot, Hook.
Horowitz: The Giant [from “Jack and the Beanstalk”]
Kitsis: We have a lot of toys, right? So we’re going to deal with them.
Horowitz: We have ideas for a lot of characters like Ariel, for example. Right now, these are the ones we’re playing with, but we’d love to have the opportunity to do a lot.

On whether Mulan, Phillip and Aurora can technically be classified as a love triangle:
Kitsis: Well, what I think is interesting about that love triangle is that it started with her, Mulan, helping her friend go wake up his true love. So in a way, the triangle is done, in the sense that she’s already said, “You need to go do that.” So what happens from here on out, and whether or not he’s dead … I mean, all I saw was his soul being sucked out …

On whether there will be one major villain in Season 2, or a number of antagonists:
Kitsis: I don’t know … I know that Barbara Hershey will be back [as Regina’s mother]. I know that Captain Hook, if I remember from “Peter Pan,” wasn’t the nicest of guys.
Horowitz: He’s got a hook on his hand!
Kitsis: I think he is misunderstood. He has a complicated backstory.


ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY: First, talk about the decision to end the first season with something people thought would end the series — breaking the curse.
We never thought of this show as the “breaking the curse” show. There were places we wanted to go beyond that. We knew people would think that [storyline] is something that’s going to drag on for years.

But you couldn’t tell viewers it was going to get broken or else it would have spoiled the finale.
EDWARD KITSIS: Breaking the curse at the end of season 1 was always the goal because it felt like it would enable us to dig deeper in season 2 about who these people are.

HOROWITZ: There were two big things in season 1 for us: Breaking the curse and Emma believing — which was the other thing I could sense the audience was going to get impatient about.

KITSIS: And her [revelation] had to come from Henry. He had to make her believe. It couldn’t just be, ‘Oh my God, Ruby, you’re right!’

HOROWITZ: There’s so much we feel like we can do with these characters now that the curse is broken, now that they know who they are. Whereas season 1, to us, it felt like it built to get us to this place.

With the curse broken, are they still trapped in Storybrooke?
HOROWITZ: That’s an excellent question. Whether they can come and go and what leaving means is something that we’re addressing pretty much out of the gate.

KITSIS: Since “Magic Is Coming,” there will be a whole different vibe to Storybrooke this year.

Now that magic has been released, is magic just in Storybrooke, or is it in, say, Portland?
KITSIS: I’ve seen a lot of people in Portland who believe magic is already there, they don’t need us to bring it. What happens when you introduce something new to a new place is exactly what the first couple of episodes will deal with.

HOROWITZ: The way magic works in our world, the rules with which it’s operating, and the way it affects our characters is different than in fairy-tale land.

A couple of actors on the Once Upon set said that this year seems “bigger.” Obviously certain costs go up each year, but were you also given more money to put on the screen?
HOROWITZ: The ambition of this season is larger than season 1. We have been allowed to do more at the start of the [season]. Without addressing the budget, everybody at the studio is on board with this as a big-canvas show… A lot of it actually is the learning-curve aspect of season 1, where we figured out what we can do and how to do it well. We learned how to maximize our bang for our buck. The biggest key is time. If we can figure out our stories far enough in advance, the more time our effects team and department heads will have.

KITSIS: And [visual effects] technology continues to improve, which helps us … Every week we try to paint ourselves into a corner and have a potential shark-jumping moment and move past it. We’re always trying to make the show something new and something fun without changing the dynamic. There’s also certain ideas that we don’t chase down like we did last year — we know that’s not what our show is now, so let’s stay on this track.

Another thing the actors said is they felt this season is more “grounded.” Obviously you’re not putting Prince Charming’s head on a spike, but is that accurate?
HOROWITZ: I think part of what they’re reacting to is we come in this year into a very tense situation and by end of the premiere it’s even more intense. We didn’t have to set up the characters and situation. So this season we could dive right into the reality of what’s happening. The emotional intensity is ratcheted up.

So now there’s three characters that most of the actors will play in season 2. There’s their current new post-curse Storybrooke selves and, in flashbacks, their pre-curse fairy-tale land selves and their cursed Storybrooke selves.
KITSIS: Yes. We’ve made nothing easy.

HOROWITZ: But hopefully cool.

Does that complexity concern you?
KITSIS: Although the show is getting more complex, the story is told through the character prism and is not about you having to remember a lot of exposition. So they get to see Rumpelstiltskin before he was the Dark One, when he was a coward. So when you see him being frightened you understand it. It’s not like he went underground where he was handed a manila envelope and we don’t tell you what’s in the envelope [for several episodes/seasons].

HOROWITZ: We made a conscious decision in season 1 to lay it all there. So we’re not in a confusing haze of trying to figure out a world.

What’s been the biggest challenge of season 2?
HOROWITZ: Honestly, the same as season 1: What’s the next story we’re dying to tell and dying to kill ourselves to tell it on our schedule and with our constraints? What’s the episode that will make everybody in the writer’s room have writer’s envy and will want to write that episode because it’s going to be the coolest one we’ve ever done?

Here’s what I find interesting about the characters you’re adding this season. Mulan is a Chinese historical figure. Captain Hook is an early 20th century literary creation and Lancelot is a fifth-century possible historical figure. Those aren’t fairy-tale characters.
KITSIS: Go back and look at the pilot when you see Henry’s book and the book flips [through the pages of illustrations from different stories]. Also the episode with the Mad Hatter when you see all the doors [to other worlds]. If you Tivo-pause those doors there are some that look different than what you might think.

HOROWITZ: Fairy tales are ground zero. They’re the first stories we hear … Will Chewbacca show up in Storybrooke? Probably not, because that’s a Lucasfilm property.

KITSIS: But he’s welcome to!

You play a lot with Disney characters. What’s something you’re not allowed to do?
KITSIS: Cinderella is not going to be doing an 8-ball in a Boogie Nights scene.

But you wouldn’t write that anyway.
HOROWITZ: You get the sense of where the line is and you try to push as far over that as you can without going too far. We want to do cool dark stories, but we don’t want to sully the characters. We had Snow “under a curse” and not behaving as herself, capture and torture a guard with an axe and threaten him. It was very real to what our Snow was doing at the time, but it’s not something traditionally Disney would want to do with that character.

KITSIS: That was our Quentin Tarantino moment.

HOROWITZ: And we had things like the Red Riding Hood episode where she kills her boyfriend and eats him. We’re getting families to watch this, but we were able to get the dark things we wanted to do.

KITSIS: For us it’s about character. Everybody has darkness in them.